Are Peoples' Lungs Different Today?
| 31 December 2012
Are Peoples' Lungs Different Today?
SMOKE SIGNALS MAGAZINE - January - February 2013
A question popped into our minds recently, as we were watching a few old movies from the 1940s on TV.
As is often the case, smoking was ubiquitous in the movies, with everyone lighting up regularly, no matter where they were, no matter what the circumstances.
The female smoking was, of course, oustanding; style was paramount, particularly in social settings. French inhales, snaps, nose exhales, residual exhales were commonplace. But that's the subject for another lament.
What really hit us, though, was the way that everyone, men and women, young and old, were taking cheek-hollowing drags on their powerful, unfiltered cigarettes - almost non-stop. And that's what got us thinking.
What is it about smokers in the 2000s, that sees most of them taking shallow inhales on light or ultra-light cigarettes, yet often only able to handle a few cigarettes a day?
We understand that the amount people smoke, particularly these days, is often constrained by the price of cigarettes and the difficulty of smoking in public. Even so, it seems that the modern day smoker's ability to "handle smoke" is far from what it used to be.
We see it regularly in filming models, who often complain about being asked to smoke full-flavored cigarettes, who more often than not can't even smoke two cigarettes without a break, and who complain about being "smoked out" when a session isn't even halfway over.
We also see the flip side of it, when members of the community lionize women who chain smoke on camera. It used to be, not so long ago, that chain smoking was almost "required behavior" in social situations. Today, fetishists rhapsodize about women who are able to chain into a second cigarette, and pledge undying love if someone smokes three in a row.
There's no question that regulations and cigarette prices have changed smokers' behavior, and there are therefore sociological reasons why people smoke less than they used to. That has no doubt made it harder for people to chain smoke.
But in watching women devour the smoke form their unfiltered cigarettes in old movies, we also have to wonder if there's been some sort of physiological change as well - making today's lungs less able to tolerate large volumes of smoke. Air pollution, perhaps? A greater prevalence of allergies, weakening lung capacity? More additives in the smoke lowering the lungs' ability to handle even light or ultra-light cigarette smoke? Fear?
There may be some elements of this discussion better suited for Vesperae's analysis - she's better at providing answers. We're better at asking questions. And this one is stuck in our minds, at least this month.
Whatever the explanation - it's certainly a shame from our perspective.
Happy New Year - and enjoy the January-February issue!
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by driving directions , October 15, 2018
written by Do My Essay For Me , February 13, 2019
written by best binary options brokers , April 12, 2019
written by writing a powerpoint presentation , April 15, 2019
written by HookUp Geek , August 28, 2019
written by Lucille F. Parham , October 07, 2019
written by Herbie Plasters , December 30, 2019
written by safetrading , February 03, 2020
written by Livia Campbel , February 06, 2020
written by peter johnee1 , April 13, 2020
written by deichmann voucher codes , April 30, 2020
written by accounting homework help online , April 30, 2020
written by accounting homework help online , April 30, 2020
accounting homework help online
written by Masterpaper Writers , May 11, 2020
written by case study answer finder , September 17, 2020
written by Finance Homework Help Online , September 17, 2020
written by joy ce , November 08, 2020
written by Elanie Brown , January 08, 2021
written by josimuddin , March 01, 2021
MindFlex
written by business assignment , March 11, 2021
written by joy ce112 , July 20, 2021
written by bubble shooter , October 19, 2021
written by BY BOOK , December 02, 2023
https://markanthonynw.gumroad.com
written by Geometry Dash , March 08, 2024
written by APPLIANCE REPAIR SOFTWARE , April 25, 2024
written by retail operations management , April 25, 2024
retail operations management
written by strikemoney , April 25, 2024
Show/hide comment form
That doesn't seem outside of the realm of possibility.
"More additives in the smoke lowering the lungs' ability to handle even light or ultra-light cigarette smoke?"
I'd bet that it's exactly this, more than any other reason, that you're seeing what you're seeing.
I remember well when PM changed the blends of all Virginia Slims and Benson & Hedges in 2006, resulting in a huge drop in "smoothness".
And I remember very, very well (painfully so) what the first wave of FSC cigarettes tasted like, and how sick they made me.
Fortunately, PM revised the FSC cigarette design in 2011, and they are at least a faint echo of what they used to be, and much more tolerable than the original FSC cigarette design, but I'm absolutely convinced that the cigarettes I'm smoking now are much "rougher" and more toxic than the cigarettes I smoked prior to 2005.
From my dalliance with MYO cigarettes following the introduction of FSC cigarettes at the end of 2009, I know that how tobaccos are cured and flavored (or not) strongly influence how mild they are when you smoke them, even if they're chock full of nicotine. I think that it would be reasonable to speculate that a lot of the early unfiltered brands were made with tobacco that had been processed specifically for mildness.
"Fear?"
Probably not. Most smokers proficient enough at smoking, and accepting enough of her attractiveness to want to model smoking, would probably have worked through any immediate fear of smoking, don't you think?
My guess is that smoking tolerance is going down because the quality of the cigarettes themselves has gone down considerably for some time.
Bum-mer.