Live phone chat and phone sex with smoking women!

SMOKE SIGNALS - SMOKING FETISH FORUM

Re:Re:Banned words - a suggestion

Re : Re:Banned words - a suggestion -- Smoke Signals

Posted by SD , Nov 29,2008,09:24

This type of for_um software is really old. Plus you can't stop people from posting if they really want too. Sure your word blocking methods reduce spam but at the cost of your regular posters here. Even if you block an IP there is a zillion proxy websites that allow you to mask your IP when posting to for_ums.

At the same time this for_um is not exactly high traffic at least in terms of how much gets posted here. Setting up a login system with accounts would prob kill the for_um all-together.

Checking the board all the time to keep it spam free must suck but the current methods are not working.

Original Message

Top of Thread

Where am I?

Followups

:-) Banned words - another suggestion --- AusNick ( Nov 29, 10:43, 2008 ) +1

Re:Banned words - another suggestion --- SpyPlane ( Nov 29, 16:10, 2008 ) +1

:-( Re:Re:Banned words - yet another suggestion --- AusNick ( Nov 30, 10:34, 2008 ) +1

Re:Re:Re:If i cared enough id read this and it might turn into a flamewar... --- SD ( Nov 30, 22:25, 2008 ) +1

:-) You obviously did, though. --- AusNick ( Dec 01, 04:14, 2008 ) +2

Re:You obviously did, though. --- Le Fettische ( Dec 01, 09:56, 2008 ) +1

Re:Re:You obviously did, though. --- AusNick ( Dec 02, 07:44, 2008 ) +1

Re:Re:Re:You obviously did, though. --- Le Fettische ( Dec 04, 13:18, 2008 ) +1

Re:Re:Re:Re:You obviously did, though. --- AusNick ( Dec 09, 10:42, 2008 )

To LobbyLoo --- Smoke Signals ( Dec 01, 06:14, 2008 )